3 ms·
The irony here is that you are responding to someone lamenting puritanical thought with a puritanical post.
by krageon 4y ago
The irony here is that you are responding to someone lamenting puritanical thought with a puritanical post.
- krrrh 4y agoThe subtlety is that the hyper stimuli of modern porn streaming, while lascivious on the inside, is leading to something that looks like puritanism on the outside, hence the drop in actual sex.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- sph 4y agoNo. What is ironic is thinking being against porn is puritanical. It's not all black and white. Like many people outside of the US, I am as far from puritanism as possible, yet I maintain that porn is a cancer. We should have more sex instead. The hippies were onto something.
- krageon 4y agoIt is in fact possible to be further from puritanism, because you could not be against porn. There's nothing wrong with sex and there's nothing wrong with filming it or otherwise making money off of it.
- sph 4y agoThat's a pretty reductive view of the matter, that completely misses the forest for the trees.