3 ms·
The letter makes that fairly clear. It's more challenging to focus on their mission, reducing opportunities for SpaceX, etc.
by huhwat 4y ago
The letter makes that fairly clear. It's more challenging to focus on their mission, reducing opportunities for SpaceX, etc.
- scarab92 4y agoThat's not even close to being considered protected activity. Given you've spammed this misinformation all over this thread, despite being corrected on this point repeatedly, I'm not sure you're acting in good faith.
- huhwat 4y agoI've been corrected by folks going, "nuh uh". A discussion about retention, recruitment, enforcement of workplace policies, and airing of collective grievances is within bounds for protected. Provided it isn't deliberately offensive, an individual grievance, or knowingly false.
- meatsauce 4y agoSeveral takedowns of your nonsense were made in good faith. You're being foolish at this point.
- flambergey 4y agoIt would seem that some lawyers agree with that poster: https://www.theverge.com/2022/6/17/23172915/elon-musk-spacex-letter-fired-legal-protected-speech-nlrb https://www.theverge.com/2022/6/17/23172915/elon-musk-spacex...