4 ms·
How was Musks public image affecting their working conditions?
by shswkna 4y ago
How was Musks public image affecting their working conditions?
- huhwat 4y agoThe letter makes that fairly clear. It's more challenging to focus on their mission, reducing opportunities for SpaceX, etc.
- scarab92 4y agoThat's not even close to being considered protected activity. Given you've spammed this misinformation all over this thread, despite being corrected on this point repeatedly, I'm not sure you're acting in good faith.
- huhwat 4y agoI've been corrected by folks going, "nuh uh". A discussion about retention, recruitment, enforcement of workplace policies, and airing of collective grievances is within bounds for protected. Provided it isn't deliberately offensive, an individual grievance, or knowingly false.
- meatsauce 4y agoSeveral takedowns of your nonsense were made in good faith. You're being foolish at this point.
- flambergey 4y agoIt would seem that some lawyers agree with that poster: https://www.theverge.com/2022/6/17/23172915/elon-musk-spacex-letter-fired-legal-protected-speech-nlrb https://www.theverge.com/2022/6/17/23172915/elon-musk-spacex...
- vkou 4y agoInconsistent enforcement of the company's rules, which is the core of the letter is very much working conditions, and his behavior very clearly shows that he is not bound by those rules.