> You are still ignoring the fact that Finland has already cured the root cause. No. If Finland had already cured the root cause, then why did we have homeless

> You are still ignoring the fact that Finland has already cured the root cause. No. If Finland had already cured the root cause, then why did we have homelessness when Housing First was initiated? Again, a steady metric does not explain a changing metric. > I am implying that education is a pre-requisite for any housing first approach No it is not, and that is completely missing the point what "housing first" means. Even the name is intended to contradict your approach. It's not "education first, then housing". It's "housing first", as in, "over here we treat the symptoms not the root cause".