5 ms·
We might be talking past each other, you claimed earlier " I've been told that medically below 1200 for a healthy and young male is low " What you've been tol
by staticman2 4y ago
We might be talking past each other, you claimed earlier
" I've been told that medically below 1200 for a healthy and young male is low "
What you've been told appears to be at odds with human biology.
I provided a reference showing this, and you responded that 1200 is "safe". Which is neither here nor there.
Perhaps it's safest to assume you misunderstood or misremembered what the doctor told you about what is low. Anything below 1200 is not low.
- 0des 4y agoI respect your testimonial although it does not match what I've been told. Ultimately everyone's treatment plan will be different according to their needs and the recommendations of their endocrinologist. If you feel great, and your blood labs look great, then 200-300 is fine for you individually. Unfortunately, it's not a one size fits all solution with a lot of different opinions as far as what constitutes therapeutic dose vs supraphysiological. 1200 is what a young adult male would have, sometimes more in certain populations. If someone is sedentary and does not engage in high intensity activities, or is overweight, I could see them being prescribed a low dose because of the risk of adverse effects. Since you appear knowledgeable and passionate about the topic: In your medical practice, what dosages of which compounds are you commonly prescribing your patients to achieve what levels for TRT? Do you have experience with trans-males? If so, what levels are you trying to maintain with them specifically in your practice?
- staticman2 4y ago1200 is not what a young adult male would have as far as I can tell. (very much "citation needed" ). I don't know what's going on here, if you are just talking about trans males I would never have responded the way I did, and you could have been clearer in your earlier posts. Or maybe you just brought that up as some sort of bad faith attempt to change the subject from the fact you are posting misinformation on human anatomy without citation? Given the sarcasm in your last paragraph that seems more likely.
- 0des 4y agoThis is going way further than was planned, and most certainly no sarcasm or misdirection was intended. Let's agree to disagree and move on.