Sure. Both you and the comment you are replying to are talking in the context of "celebrity endorses crypto, man loses pension". This is not the context in the

Sure. Both you and the comment you are replying to are talking in the context of "celebrity endorses crypto, man loses pension". This is not the context in the OP. In OP case no celebrity was endorsing the scam, the scammers simply used the likeness of celebrities without permission to advertise their fake trading website that wasn't actually dealing with crypto at all. So the context of your discussion is misleading in 2 ways: 1) You're implying that OP has something to do with crypto investments. It doesn't. 2) You're implying that OP has something to do with celebrities endorsing crypto investments. It doesn't.