> Not sure what Turing would say, but I don’t think the Turing Test itself is meaningful > relies on human gullibility No, it doesn’t. Thought Turing didn’t

> Not sure what Turing would say, but I don’t think the Turing Test itself is meaningful > relies on human gullibility No, it doesn’t. Thought Turing didn’t say so explicitly, the example in his paper clearly shows that the judge is supposed to be a sceptical, adversarial party who is aware that their interlocutor may be a machine and is determined to uncover their identity. Most claims of ‘passing the Turing test’ didn’t secure this basic standard of rigour. The true Turing test has never been attempted. It’s like communism.