3 ms·
> there's no actual evidence that you can create an accurate digital model that is equivalent to an analog and biochemical brain. There are mountains of eviden
by skulk 4y ago
> there's no actual evidence that you can create an accurate digital model that is equivalent to an analog and biochemical brain.
There are mountains of evidence in favor of the Standard Model, which is computable. Therefore, there actually _is_ evidence that the human brain can be similarly computed. (Whether our technology can ever come near to this kind of power is where I have doubts). What there _isn't_ evidence for is that there is anything non-computable within the human brain.
- Der_Einzige 4y agoWhat about bells theorem, which implies that the universe has inherent non determinism associated with it? Meaning that computability doesn't matter if there's inherently randomness at the smallest scales
- kadoban 4y agoYou can have computation that requires randomness either in its output or in its processing.