3 ms·

More FUD to push the agenda. Remember when we're freezing and starving in the dark that this blinkered view of civilisation is what brought us to the inevitabl

by Guthur 4y ago

More FUD to push the agenda. Remember when we're freezing and starving in the dark that this blinkered view of civilisation is what brought us to the inevitable end that the green agenda brings forth. We do not have the alternatives for what you want to get rid of, period. Industrialisation has brought us to where we are, removing it for this nonsense will doom billions.

areoform 4y ago
As an internet stranger, I would like to overstep my bounds and recommend some reflection on what drove you to this reaction. If you read the article, it's an extremely thoughtful point that makes sense if you know a bit of biology & chemistry, > In Western Europe, yields were estimated to improve nearly 10% for both winter and summer crops. Crop yields in India were calculated to increase by roughly eight percent for summer crops and six percent for winter crops. North and South America were generally shown to have the lowest levels of NOx exposures. > > Overall, the study highlighted that effects appeared most negative in the seasons and locations where NOx likely drives ozone formation. You can read what Ozone does to plants here, https://www.nps.gov/subjects/air/nature-ozone.htm https://www.nps.gov/subjects/air/nature-ozone.htm Just like it irritates/burns our tissues, it does so with plants as well. You can also trivially arrive at the relationship between NOx and Ozone here, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NOx#Formation_and_reactions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NOx#Formation_and_reactions Your reaction is deeply out of proportion here.
chimprich 4y ago
> More FUD to push the agenda. You are providing the FUD: > Industrialisation has brought us to where we are, removing it for this nonsense will doom billions. Who is advocating removing industrialisation? The article points a way towards higher crop yields. Do you have any actual criticisms of the article itself or just vague emotional generalities?
imtringued 4y ago

by Guthur 4y ago

areoform 4y ago

As an internet stranger, I would like to overstep my bounds and recommend some reflection on what drove you to this reaction. If you read the article, it's an extremely thoughtful point that makes sense if you know a bit of biology & chemistry, > In Western Europe, yields were estimated to improve nearly 10% for both winter and summer crops. Crop yields in India were calculated to increase by roughly eight percent for summer crops and six percent for winter crops. North and South America were generally shown to have the lowest levels of NOx exposures. > > Overall, the study highlighted that effects appeared most negative in the seasons and locations where NOx likely drives ozone formation. You can read what Ozone does to plants here, https://www.nps.gov/subjects/air/nature-ozone.htm https://www.nps.gov/subjects/air/nature-ozone.htm Just like it irritates/burns our tissues, it does so with plants as well. You can also trivially arrive at the relationship between NOx and Ozone here, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NOx#Formation_and_reactions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NOx#Formation_and_reactions Your reaction is deeply out of proportion here.

chimprich 4y ago

> More FUD to push the agenda. You are providing the FUD: > Industrialisation has brought us to where we are, removing it for this nonsense will doom billions. Who is advocating removing industrialisation? The article points a way towards higher crop yields. Do you have any actual criticisms of the article itself or just vague emotional generalities?

imtringued 4y ago