3 ms·
False dichotomy. It's like countering homelessness by enforcing that a portion of housing is accessible, affordable low-income housing. People sitting in high
by minsc_and_boo 4y ago
False dichotomy.
It's like countering homelessness by enforcing that a portion of housing is accessible, affordable low-income housing. People sitting in high-income housing then make frivolous statements about all the houses being burnt down, or how we should also remove public basketball courts because of the NBA.
- qgin 4y agoNo, you’re talking about option #1, which I also agree is better. That’s not what’s happening here. If you see a program that doesn’t have equal access, and instead of doing the hard work to get to equal access, you just get rid of the program… that’s the #2 option, the one I’m referring to, which is worse for everyone.