5 ms·
Really? Don't remember last time i saw a car doing 20-25mph on a 4ft wide pavement. I saw it twice this morning with scooters
by easytiger 4y ago
Really? Don't remember last time i saw a car doing 20-25mph on a 4ft wide pavement. I saw it twice this morning with scooters
- davidmr 4y agoIn Berlin, this morning: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jun/08/car-driven-into-crowd-berlin https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jun/08/car-driven-int...
- nixass 4y agoWhat does this have to do with the topic of discussion?
- substation13 4y agoConsider why the pavement is only 4ft wide.
- tomcam 4y agoBecause London is a 2000 year old city?
- kitten_mittens_ 4y agoWalking on a roads was a thing (and still is in some places). Tokyo, for example.
- 13of40 4y agoThe place I'm in right now is supposedly a modern development but the sidewalks are in such disrepair / built over / covered in debris that everyone just walks in the road with the traffic.
- dijit 4y agoIt’s been rebuilt many times since then, even discounting the bombing of World War Two which destroyed roughly 2 million homes (of approx 5 million at the time in London). The great fire of London literally reduced the city by so much that practically the entire city was rebuilt; that was only 350y ago (not making the case that you’re wrong about it being old, but 2,000 years is unfortunately wrong) Anyway, urban design is not set in stone. It’s interesting to look at the evolution of Los Angeles as an example of a city that already exists being radically changed, entire blocks of buildings were demolished to make downtown roads so wide.
- sofixa 4y ago> It’s interesting to look at the evolution of Los Angeles as an example of a city that already exists being radically changed, entire blocks of buildings were demolished to make downtown roads so wide I'm not sure giving LA, one of the poster cities for how not to do urban design, as an example, is a great idea. Paris did the same thing, only in a much more measured fashion, in the 1760s under Haussmann and Napoléon III. However destroying parts of a city which is thousands of years old just to increase the size of sidewalks would be to destroy historical monuments for minimal gains. If anything, making most small streets pedestrian and bike only sounds smarter.
- dijit 4y agoWasn’t making the point that it was good but saying that urban design is locked in to “history” is the most common argument against good cycling infrastructure. (and i was trying to correct the notion that the city of london has not had radical changes in its urban design for 2000 years)
- substation13 4y agoAnd funnily Paris is re-configuring the city for active travel right now!
- mrcartmeneses 4y agoIt’s the huge amount of space given to cars. Or did those exists 2000 years ago also?
- easytiger 4y agoSome of the roads where i live are over 2000 years old. Was it because society used vehicles to build their civilisation and to move goods and provide services at lower latency? If scooter users stayed on roads i wouldn't have a problem. But the technology lends itself to abuse by people with no knowledge of safe road use.
- bradhe 4y ago20-25mph is an exaggeration at best. Otherwise, check out r/IdiotsInCars.
- easytiger 4y ago> 20-25mph is an exaggeration at best. No. It is not. I even had work colleagues modifying their scooters firmware to do up to or over 30mph
- oblio 4y agoThat looks like a recipe for broken bones.
- mrcartmeneses 4y agoYou’d think that would stop them but you’ve only got to see Barcelona’s motorcycle injury rates or Bangkok’s vehicle death rates to see that isn’t the case.
- Balero 4y agoThis is illegal in the UK. You cannot legally drive a privately owned scooter in public. They are classed as vehicles and you need to be insured to drive them, you cannot insure a private scooter. When you rent a scooter from one of the apps they come with insurance built in. Your colleague, and others, breaking the law and driving dangerously does not mean we should get rid of a means of transportation that is legally and safely used by others.
- itg 4y agoPeople operating electric scooters recklessly do not get a pass because some people drive their cars like idiots.
- easytiger 4y agoIn my experience it is the majority of users here in London. They feel like quasi pedestrians so they run lights, use pavements and operate without a driving license (as required by law). Given at the moment there are so few of them relatively speaking the coming epidemic of scooters will be a disaster for pedestrians
- vehemenz 4y agoI don’t get the point you are trying to make here. Drivers operating cars 100% legally are a bigger threat to pedestrians than reckless scooter users.
- lozenge 4y agoAre we replacing drivers though, or just adding a new threat to our streets on top of existing ones. Here in London at least, scooter journeys are mostly impractical by private car due to lack of parking. Logically they are replacing bus journeys, walking, taxis and cycling.
- serf 4y agothe point is that there is an emerging new threat. aside : i'd like to see this world of yours where cars are operated 100% legally -- even very responsible drivers tend to violate some road laws on a fairly common basis.
- chucksta 4y agoThey meant a fictional %100 legal operation of cars is still more dangerous than scooters