3 ms·
Nobody seems to have figured out how to make bridging the Darién Gap cost effective. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dari%C3%A9n_Gap#By_land https://en.wikipedia.
by wahern 4y ago
Nobody seems to have figured out how to make bridging the Darién Gap cost effective. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dari%C3%A9n_Gap#By_land https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dari%C3%A9n_Gap#By_land
Plus, there's not even any rail line reaching Panama. The southern terminus of the North American rail infrastructure is Mexico, I think. I doubt trucking everything through Central America would be very cost effective. So you're not only building a new line through 66 miles of some of the most difficult and remote terrain in the world, you're building or refurbishing another ~1500+ miles of rail.
And then you're only reaching Columbia and Venezuela, with the Andes and the Amazon between you and the two biggest markets in South America: Brazil and Argentina.
It would be cool if it happened, but I think it would have to be a regional public works project funded primarily by the U.S. government. Unless Musk is looking for his next challenge (and he can make it pencil out with his Fermi-math voodoo). Maybe the U.S. can sell it to taxpayers as a jobs and economic development program to stem the tide of Central American refugees.
- aunty_helen 4y agoI flew across the Darien gap twice in the last week and the area has always interested me for the very subject of why don’t they join south and north. Simply, there’s no cost effective way. The landscape is wet. You would effectively be building a bridge the whole way. Whilst fighting a guerrilla war, disease and ruining an ecological system in the process.