3 ms·
This is a flawed comparison because the use cases for the former examples are very limited in comparison to USB C which is arguably evolving rapidly still. You
by CardenB 4y ago
This is a flawed comparison because the use cases for the former examples are very limited in comparison to USB C which is arguably evolving rapidly still.
You could imagine if we had formed such a standard around USB A in the 90s and how it might have blocked the already high friction establishment of USB C and thunderbolt 3 standards.
USB C currently seems more mature than USB A, so I can see where things ar ea bit subjective here, but it's not really possible to see where unrestricted development would have put us.
I think I would have been more comfortable with simply banning lightning and micro USB than restricting to only USB C.
- bonzini 4y agoThe first version of the EU regulation suggested USB micro. There's a reason why it took ten years to go from suggestion to requirement.
- ClumsyPilot 4y agoThis regulation is about charging - so power, not data / thunderbolt. And when it comes to charging USB C can delvier 100W, which is enough for any small gadget, phone, etc.
- Dylan16807 4y agoThey upgraded it to 240W.