4 ms·
Interesting. I think AWS wins hands down for the prompts: > Sarah Connor? and > Come with me if you want to live. But the professor edges out on top for: >
by e12e 4y ago
Interesting. I think AWS wins hands down for the prompts:
> Sarah Connor?
and
> Come with me if you want to live.
But the professor edges out on top for:
> Never harm a human or through inaction allow a human to come to harm.
- jazz3020 4y agoRight off the bat, the third sentence looks much more like what my data looks like, and the kind of text I wanted people to use it for. Where is the line from?
- sha-3 4y agoI'm guessing it's from Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics.
- e12e 4y agoYes, it's a (paraphrase from memory) of the first law of robotics. It's good that that's more in line with how the ai should be used, I suppose ;) Ed: according to Wikipedia I got it pretty close: > First Law > A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. > Second Law > A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. > Third Law > A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Laws_of_Robotics https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Laws_of_Robotics Just remember, Asimov himself pointed out through his works that the three laws are not enough! :)