3 ms·
> willful misinterpretation of the 2nd amendment that has been specifically rejected by the Supreme Court I can interpret the text how I want, regardless of th
by ok_dad 4y ago
> willful misinterpretation of the 2nd amendment that has been specifically rejected by the Supreme Court
I can interpret the text how I want, regardless of the opinion of a captured, political organization like the SC.
> It’s also contrary to many state constitutions, which provide an even more definitive individual, affirmative right to bear arms.
See: Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution (again, I reject the SC's opinion on these matters, so I believe the supremacy clause should override those state's constitutions)
I'm not going to reply to you again, though, because clearly we have different base axioms we're starting from here.
- yeetawayhn 4y agoIt's true, you could also interpret the first amendment to mean that you have freedom of picking any religion you want, but you still have to pick a religion. That wouldn't make it reasonable, but you could.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]