5 ms·

How is it more reasonable? He's comparing Steve Jobs to an infamously corrupt mayor who brutally suppressed anti-Vietnam war protestors and fixed elections to a

How is it more reasonable? He's comparing Steve Jobs to an infamously corrupt mayor who brutally suppressed anti-Vietnam war protestors and fixed elections to a guy who created products people loved (and was something of a jerk at a personal level, but that's something Stallman should approve of). But oops, he got the quotation slightly wrong. It doesn't change the meaning but better make sure he gets the quotation right. Oh yeah, and Jobs was objectionable not for making computers stylish but for being GOOD at at. If people hadn't liked his computers that would have been OK.

alphadogg 15y ago
Looks like someone completely missed Stallman's point...
bitemyapp 15y ago
He's explaining the source of his words, not comparing them. You're too hysterical to speak with reasonably.
jrockway 15y ago
Software freedom is more important than "products people love".
- uriel 15y ago
  I'm not a big fan of RMS, but this is a good point, in our current world the freedom to control the software that runs on devices you own is becoming more and more essential, not having that freedom undermines all other freedoms (from privacy to free speech).
- glhaynes 15y ago
  Not everyone agrees on that. In fact, it's easily arguable that the vast majority disagree.
  - jrockway 15y ago
    Based on the number of upvotes my comment got, I'm not sure that a vast majority disagrees.
    - glhaynes 15y ago
      Might be some selection bias going on there. ;)
lambda 15y ago
His complaint isn't that Jobs was good at it. His complaint is that Jobs sells computers that restrict users freedoms to use their own hardware as they see fit, with their own software or software of their choice. He merely complains about Jobs being good at it because that helps convince users to use machines that otherwise restrict their freedom. The thing is, a lot of people are willing to trade their freedom for a little convenience, especially if that freedom seems abstract and the convenience is immediate. But if enough people do that, you can run into serious trouble.
- oemera 15y ago
  Oh come on! As if you would be handcuffed by using a iOS device. Think about all those viruses and all those people who are not IT-guys, they don't need this complicated "you can do everything but you need to read a bunch of books before"-thing. It is simple: Just make it easy and iOS is easy. There is one AppStore not 7 like on the Android. There are iOS updates for the newest devices not like Android for those who are the chosen ones. I could go on and on. If you want crappy software and hardware back then please go and support those crappy software and hardware makers. I will stick to simpleness and convenience.
  - iradik 15y ago
    So you prefer it that apple can reject any app at will?
    - oemera 15y ago
      Yes if they think your App has errors and is not self explaining or working properly it is ok to reject your App. Is it ok that you can only develop for the Playstation if you are a game development studio? Yes I think so too.
      - MostAwesomeDude 15y ago
        You're not a fan of the relatively low barrier to entry on the WiiWare, Xbox Live Arcade, and Steam platforms? You don't enjoy relatively new people creating games without large war chests or corporate backing? That's too bad. :c
Kylekramer 15y ago
At risk of Godwinning, let's just say that often the people actively and happily chose things that are very oppressive. And this is were Stallman is coming from. He very explicitly understands that people like Apple products (he even says that making things stylish and smooth are positives in this piece). It is because Apple products are so good that Stallman reacts so strongly to them. You and I may disagree with him about how oppressive Apple devices are, but there is definitely a reasonable argument to be made that they are.
- mentat 15y ago
  It's easier to hold onto principles than to deal with people. If there's anything that makes "tech people" in general outcast it's that. Ironically there's also a tendency to reject other people who strongly hold on to opposing principles, but I guess that makes sense without empathy.
  - barrkel 15y ago
    Your first two sentences are contradictory; if holding principles was easier than compromising and dealing with people, then that group would be the majority, and "tech people" would not be "in general outcast" (though I happen to think they aren't). Either that, or you mean something different by "easy" than I think you do. I mean, peer pressure is substantial; it's much easier to stick with the crowd, not stick out, go with the flow, etc. Holding to principles and walking against this tide is hard, not easy. Such people are very much the exception, not the rule.
    - mentat 15y ago
      Easier meaning more simple not easier in terms of effort. Dealing with the complexities and ambiguities of human behavior is more difficult in terms of the processing, both mental and emotional, that must happen. It's easier to say "it's always wrong to lie" then to consider all the situations that might come up in which it may be better to lie.
      - 15y ago
rryan 15y ago
Downvoted for your ad hominem. Quality discussion is valued on HN. Please argue your point without rhetorical tricks.
burke 15y ago
It's not about the content; it's just about the level of empathy implied. This correction had some, and he went to greater length to explain that he had nothing against Steve personally.

alphadogg 15y ago

Looks like someone completely missed Stallman's point...

bitemyapp 15y ago

He's explaining the source of his words, not comparing them. You're too hysterical to speak with reasonably.

jrockway 15y ago

Software freedom is more important than "products people love".

uriel 15y ago
I'm not a big fan of RMS, but this is a good point, in our current world the freedom to control the software that runs on devices you own is becoming more and more essential, not having that freedom undermines all other freedoms (from privacy to free speech).
glhaynes 15y ago
Not everyone agrees on that. In fact, it's easily arguable that the vast majority disagree.
- jrockway 15y ago
  Based on the number of upvotes my comment got, I'm not sure that a vast majority disagrees.
  - glhaynes 15y ago
    Might be some selection bias going on there. ;)

lambda 15y ago

His complaint isn't that Jobs was good at it. His complaint is that Jobs sells computers that restrict users freedoms to use their own hardware as they see fit, with their own software or software of their choice. He merely complains about Jobs being good at it because that helps convince users to use machines that otherwise restrict their freedom. The thing is, a lot of people are willing to trade their freedom for a little convenience, especially if that freedom seems abstract and the convenience is immediate. But if enough people do that, you can run into serious trouble.

oemera 15y ago
Oh come on! As if you would be handcuffed by using a iOS device. Think about all those viruses and all those people who are not IT-guys, they don't need this complicated "you can do everything but you need to read a bunch of books before"-thing. It is simple: Just make it easy and iOS is easy. There is one AppStore not 7 like on the Android. There are iOS updates for the newest devices not like Android for those who are the chosen ones. I could go on and on. If you want crappy software and hardware back then please go and support those crappy software and hardware makers. I will stick to simpleness and convenience.
- iradik 15y ago
  So you prefer it that apple can reject any app at will?
  - oemera 15y ago
    Yes if they think your App has errors and is not self explaining or working properly it is ok to reject your App. Is it ok that you can only develop for the Playstation if you are a game development studio? Yes I think so too.
    - MostAwesomeDude 15y ago
      You're not a fan of the relatively low barrier to entry on the WiiWare, Xbox Live Arcade, and Steam platforms? You don't enjoy relatively new people creating games without large war chests or corporate backing? That's too bad. :c

Kylekramer 15y ago

At risk of Godwinning, let's just say that often the people actively and happily chose things that are very oppressive. And this is were Stallman is coming from. He very explicitly understands that people like Apple products (he even says that making things stylish and smooth are positives in this piece). It is because Apple products are so good that Stallman reacts so strongly to them. You and I may disagree with him about how oppressive Apple devices are, but there is definitely a reasonable argument to be made that they are.

mentat 15y ago
It's easier to hold onto principles than to deal with people. If there's anything that makes "tech people" in general outcast it's that. Ironically there's also a tendency to reject other people who strongly hold on to opposing principles, but I guess that makes sense without empathy.
- barrkel 15y ago
  Your first two sentences are contradictory; if holding principles was easier than compromising and dealing with people, then that group would be the majority, and "tech people" would not be "in general outcast" (though I happen to think they aren't). Either that, or you mean something different by "easy" than I think you do. I mean, peer pressure is substantial; it's much easier to stick with the crowd, not stick out, go with the flow, etc. Holding to principles and walking against this tide is hard, not easy. Such people are very much the exception, not the rule.
  - mentat 15y ago
    Easier meaning more simple not easier in terms of effort. Dealing with the complexities and ambiguities of human behavior is more difficult in terms of the processing, both mental and emotional, that must happen. It's easier to say "it's always wrong to lie" then to consider all the situations that might come up in which it may be better to lie.
    - 15y ago

rryan 15y ago

Downvoted for your ad hominem. Quality discussion is valued on HN. Please argue your point without rhetorical tricks.

burke 15y ago

It's not about the content; it's just about the level of empathy implied. This correction had some, and he went to greater length to explain that he had nothing against Steve personally.