4 ms·
The court took this step because certain terrestrial invertebrates were explicitly added to the category. So it can no longer be interpreted as somehow only bei
by kevin_b_er 4y ago
The court took this step because certain terrestrial invertebrates were explicitly added to the category. So it can no longer be interpreted as somehow only being aquatic critters. "Zero evidence" is a strong claim and much of this entire judgement is about how there is evidence.
- butlerm 4y agoThey could have just as easily considered the terrestrial invertebrate in question (the Trinity bristle snail) to be an exception or to fall under "mollusks". The problem is that there are canons of construction by which they could go either way. The statute is poorly drafted.