3 ms·
> I am amused that folks seem to think we could eradicate so many widespread diseases with just masks. This is a claim that is novel to me. Masks help limit t
by SkyPuncher 4y ago
> I am amused that folks seem to think we could eradicate so many widespread diseases with just masks.
This is a claim that is novel to me.
Masks help limit transmission. The immediate benefit is likely reducing transmission between an interaction of random people. A secondary, less supported benefit, is the reduction of viral load in transmissions - which can help reduce severity of an infection.
This is not shocking when you consider the fact that surgeons have worn masks for a long time - with nearly the sole intention of reducing infection in their patients (albeit, not necessarily airborne infections).
-----
IMO, people should be more outraged that the gov't did seemingly little to actually increase the healthcare's system to accommodate COVID patients. My understanding is mask mandates were almost always tied to significant capacity restrictions in the healthcare system. The idea of wearing masks was to create a buffer for healthcare to catch up.
- nradov 4y agoSurgeons have primarily worn masks and other PPE to reduce the risk of bacterial infections in open wounds, and protect themselves against bodily fluids. Protecting against respiratory viruses is something quite different. The mask mandates implemented in most places were always pointless pandemic theater. Only a properly fitted (i.e. tightly sealed with no facial hair) N95 or equivalent does much to block transmission of a highly contagious respiratory virus. It was never realistic to get the general public to do that.