This article seems full of easily falsifiable claims, chief among these being the claims made about the fraudulent credentials of the CEO. If that claim is fals

This article seems full of easily falsifiable claims, chief among these being the claims made about the fraudulent credentials of the CEO. If that claim is false the CEO could easily puncture the whole thing by showing proof otherwise. Not only that, but if this is false it seems extremely actionable. Couldn't the characters here sue the pants off the authors if these claims are false? Not to mention the exposure to SEC action for taking a short position and then slandering the company. I know this does happen and is rarely prosecuted but combined with the civil liability that seems like a lot of exposure for Scorpion Capital.