Not op, but here’s my concerns and suggestions: 1. It’s a search engine, not a news aggregator with curated content. If there’s a lot of “disinformation” resul

Not op, but here’s my concerns and suggestions: 1. It’s a search engine, not a news aggregator with curated content. If there’s a lot of “disinformation” results on the top so be it, it’s the state of the current information space. Ones goal may be to specifically look for the propaganda articles for curiosity purposes. 2. It probably make sense to use something like google does with pictures - be able to un-filter the “disinformation” links by implicitly allowing it. Maybe marking the results with warning tags/labels would help as well. 3. If there’s such filter exists it would make sense to filter not only the specific country news, but all of them. 4. It’s difficult to me to believe that they are able to do this filtering/downranking right. It’s very difficult task to be objective in absence of trusted sources (except the 2+2=5 situations, probably).