3 ms·
Even without the deaths if these parts of the allegations are correct, it seems like a firing is in order: > In May 2021 WSCUC, Stanford’s accreditation regula
by shkkmo 4y ago
Even without the deaths if these parts of the allegations are correct, it seems like a firing is in order:
> In May 2021 WSCUC, Stanford’s accreditation regulator, launched a formal investigation into President Tessier-Lavigne’s administration.
> In an unsigned and undated letter, President Tessier-Lavigne’s administration lied repeatedly to WSCUC investigators.
> President Tessier-Lavigne’s administration forged and destroyed critical case notes and fired a low-level administrator that spoke out against the administration’s misconduct.
- dekhn 4y agoDoes anybody have any references for this statement: "In an unsigned and undated letter, President Tessier-Lavigne’s administration lied repeatedly to WSCUC investigators." I'm trying to understand what's meant by that, and I can't find anything referencing it online.
- shkkmo 4y agoIt's a reference to the Author's past issues with the Stanford Administration described in this 2021 Medium post that they link to: https://erdorsey2.medium.com/persis-drell-should-resign-as-stanfords-provost-b1d1c083ea18 https://erdorsey2.medium.com/persis-drell-should-resign-as-s...