3 ms·

I’m not sure I’ve seen such superficial commentary here (it feels more like Reddit frankly) for such a popular thread. Not really a criticism (ok maybe a littl

by maegul 4y ago

I’m not sure I’ve seen such superficial commentary here (it feels more like Reddit frankly) for such a popular thread. Not really a criticism (ok maybe a little), but perhaps more of an indication that these discoveries are truly novel and baffling.

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
AlotOfReading 4y ago
This is fairly typical for HN links that touch on ancient archaeology, especially anything tangentially related to popular alt-history figures like Graham Hancock. However, metadiscussion about the quality of other comments feels like it goes against a few of the rules. It's better to explain the issues directly in replies.
yung_steezy 4y ago
I would guess comments are more insightful when the topic being discussed is less niche.