3 ms·
Turns out, it's not the creator of OnlyFans, but a "creator" /on/ OnlyFans. Also, an Instagram /account/ was reinstated, not all of Instagram.
by jmbwell 4y ago
Turns out, it's not the creator of OnlyFans, but a "creator" /on/ OnlyFans.
Also, an Instagram /account/ was reinstated, not all of Instagram.
- warent 4y agoThanks for clarifying. I was actually thinking the founder of OnlyFans and admittedly have a really bad tendency about 25% of the time to only read headlines.
- SemanticStrengh 4y agoare there stats on this? >have a really bad tendency about 25% of the time to only read headlines.
- jimmy2020 4y agoshould read this comment before reading the article
- make3 4y agoyou seriously thought it was about reinstating all of Instagram?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- dundermuffl1n 4y agoBeing a "creator" or "influencer" has pervaded our cultural ethos so deeply, you'd be in the minority for assuming that it's the creator of Onlyfans or that all of Instagram had to be reinstated. These are popular consumer brands, and colloquialism would prefer their "insta" or "instagram", rather than "instagram profile".
- MiddleEndian 4y agoI also assumed based on this title that it was the founder of OnlyFans and was underwhelmed by the actual article.
- obloid 4y agosame here. I was expecting to read about the founder of onlyfans but turns out it was just a user of the service. Much less interesting story.