3 ms·
If you read what actually happened you can see that all proper internal procedures were followed. Corruption heavily implies that something that exists for othe
by krageon 4y ago
If you read what actually happened you can see that all proper internal procedures were followed. Corruption heavily implies that something that exists for other people is (temporarily) removed, or some requirement is waived as a result of compensation. That is not what happened.
- GlassKingdom 4y agoIt’s “corruption” by any credible meaning of the word. If the story is true then it’s a catastrophe for Meta.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- austinkhale 4y agoIf internal procedures allow Meta employees to be paid (in cash or favors of any kind) to be internal champions for repeatedly resubmitting bans to the Integrity Team roulette appeals process, “proper” is the opposite of the word I would use to describe the practice.
- altairprime 4y agoThat’s how “friends and family” policies work, though: the company gives you perks to bestow upon your friends, so that they can trade their relationship with you for a benefit.
- enumjorge 4y agoShe used sexual favors to get an employee to unban the account that shouldn’t have been banned in the first place. I doubt those are proper procedures as defined by Meta’s guidelines.