3 ms·
We absolutely can have both of these futures -- if people use the right tool for the right job and both of these tools can coexist (even if not used in the exac
by hardwaresofton 4y ago
We absolutely can have both of these futures -- if people use the right tool for the right job and both of these tools can coexist (even if not used in the exact solution).
Also roads may just be the first use case for this technology but new thinkers and new people will find new usecases.
- jazzythom 4y agoWhat about the malicious actors in the crowd? This is an asymmetric vector with significant latency
- whynotminot 4y agoA malicious actor could also dump termites on your lawn, start a fire, throw a rock through your window, etc. What you bring up is a point for the police to investigate, and maybe a few more lines in your insurance policy to cover. If you’ve made an enemy, it doesn’t really matter what your house is made of.
- jazzythom 4y agoHow about a billion dollar bridge?
- whynotminot 4y agoThen maybe not? I’m guessing there’s a lot of risk analysis that goes into building billion dollar structures.
- mattkrause 4y agoIf it's this one from Lu et al. (20022; Nature[0]), it operates best in a 50-70˚C, pH-buffered solution. Plus, it benefits from thermal pre-treatment to break up the crystal structure. If someone floods your house--for days or weeks at a time--with a scalding solution, I think you're going to be annoyed regardless of what else is in it. [0] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04599-z https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04599-z