6 ms·
Ask HN: I found a pretty extreme data leak and I'm not sure what to do
Long story short, through a bizarre chain of events starting from trying to hire a contractor online an anonymous person (the title is from their perspective) has uncovered and has access to thousands of user credentials (email + CLEARTEXT password), associated addresses, company information, as well as associated active API keys for stock and crypto exchange accounts, and to top it all off some of them have withdrawal permissions.
The entity affected by this vulnerability is NOT a trustworthy company, it is not even a registered company. The service is operated by individuals and not under a registered business entity. The anonymous person wants to assure you that no sane person would ever subscribe to it, they are providing technically borderline illegal / grey area services (for they are not licensed as they should), yet there are thousands of paying active users.
The nature of access is such that it is somewhat hard for bots to find, which the anonymous person assumes is the reason it seems untampered with, but they have not tried executing write operations so they have no idea if it may only be read-only access and bots had a field day on it already - they doubt it at this point. The database itself also contains admin credentials to an internal administration interface which HAS write permissions.
Now, there might obviously be some documentation going on, but they are seriously wondering what to do with this before anything else.
As far as they see it, there are three options right now,
1) Contact the site owners themselves and let them know, but the... service they run seems shady, it is not a company, and the anonymous person worries that they might try to simply sweep it under the rug without informing their customers or doing nothing at all about it (if they are even still around, the last admin login in their system seems to be from March even though there are thousands of users still active)
2) Scrape off the email addresses and send emails to the affected individuals, warning them of the data leak, urging them to change their passwords and disable the API keys, however the anonymous person worries that their emails either get routed to spam or ignored by a good amount of them
3) Nuke the data to prevent any future harm
They are super lost.
- Dr_ReD 4y agoYou found a dead body and started looking into its pockets... It's never a good idea. I'd step away immediately and notify the site owner. Anonymously, if possible.
- elorant 4y agoWhy don't you try contacting a law enforcement agency, and let them handle it from there on?
- _jvqm 4y agoIf there is something they will not do until they have spoken to an attorney it is exactly this..
- mulmen 4y agoThis is terrible advice. Do not talk to the police. You have nothing to gain and everything to lose. Contact a lawyer. https://youtu.be/d-7o9xYp7eE https://youtu.be/d-7o9xYp7eE
- krageon 4y agoWhat they did is a crime, going to the police to say "hello I did a crime!" is a legal darwin award.
- elorant 4y agoYou can contact the police anonymously, or through a lawyer.
- vpb 4y agoMaybe contact Have I Been Pwned?, work with them to add it to their leak database, notify site owners afterwards with a timeframe for disclosure and release your findings/blog post? Give people a way to check with HIBP, site owners a way to mitigate and claim the credit for the discovery.
- password4321 4y agoThis is probably the best option for anyone actually trying to fix the problem. https://haveibeenpwned.com/FAQs#SubmitBreach https://haveibeenpwned.com/FAQs#SubmitBreach > If you've come across a data breach which you'd like to submit, get in touch with me. https://www.troyhunt.com/contact https://www.troyhunt.com/contact Good luck on your OPSEC, should not have used your 7 year old account... might hit up dang to change the account so you don't get kidnapped.
- brightball 4y agoSeriously, this. You just publicly stated you have access to millions.
- _jvqm 4y agoThat is not a very special occurrence. I’d argue you can find almost anyone with access to a million dollars online. Just go to Twitter or so.
- j-bos 4y agoTake a look at the hn reaction to your post, this is a special occurence. Regardless it's your decision and I imagine you have your reasons.
- _jvqm 4y agoFinding such a thing might be somewhat special, but (referring to your comment) having theoretical access to money is definitely not a special thing.
- spacemanmatt 4y agoI would scrape the data whole, then contact the site owners and send them a copy, maybe through an attorney. Nuking the data will likely make you a fugitive of the law. I would not advise that.
- pseudolus 4y agoRe: steps 2 and 3, they could (and I would emphasize that I'm not a domain specialist) be perceived as being criminal in nature - obviously depending on the jurisdiction(s) involved. With respect to IT, history has shown that the road to a prison cell is paved with good intentions. You might be expecting gratitude but there's a good chance you'll come up against a 'shoot the messenger' mentality. Here's some quick US related info: https://www.thefederalcriminalattorneys.com/federal-computer-hacking#:~:text=Federal%20Crime%20of%20Computer%20Hacking,Computer%20Fraud%20and%20Abuse%20Act https://www.thefederalcriminalattorneys.com/federal-computer....
- _jvqm 4y agoStep 3 is definitely and understandably so not a very legal thing to do, however I'm not sure about simply sending off emails? The person in question did not do anything illegal to gain access to this database in the first place, it is wide open. They are not realistically expecting gratitude, they are simply not willing to ignore this risk to other humans.
- pseudolus 4y agoWhether you did or didn't do something criminal to gain access to the emails would likely be determined by the mood of the prosecutor on a particular day or, worse, by a judge or jury. Perhaps the most advisable course would be to contact your local bar association for a referral or the EFF.
- _jvqm 4y agoThey are not based in the United States, but I think you are right regardless and they will call an attorney tomorrow.
- pseudolus 4y agoNot being based in the US doesn't mean that you can't be criminally prosecuted in the US or, for that matter any jurisdiction that takes an interest and has a generous belief in the extra-territorial applicability of its laws.
- monkeybutton 4y agoAsk the site owners to start a bug bounty program.
- _jvqm 4y agoLol, trust me, they will not start a bug bounty program.
- akeck 4y agoTread very carefully. You probably need a lawyer. Consider reporting with extremely careful anonymity to affected parties. Do not blog about it until and unless cleared to do so by a lawyer.
- pooper 4y ago> Do not blog about it until and unless cleared to do so by a lawyer. I anal but do not blog about it EVEN IF cleated to do so by a lawyer. Get a second opinion anyways. It is you who risks prison, not the lawyer.
- _jvqm 4y agoNo blogging.
- axiosgunnar 4y agoI anal too
- foobarian 4y agoOption 4: Do absolutely nothing. Slowly step away from the vehicle. And walk away.
- _jvqm 4y agoThey would rather not live in the assumption that they are responsible by proxy/neglect.
- jodrellblank 4y ago"A clear conscience? When did you acquire this taste for luxuries?" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNKjShmHw7s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNKjShmHw7s [You do you, but "letting people know a crypto company in Russia(?) is a bit shady" is not at the same level as walking past a person in trouble and ignoring them. The risks to your person and life of 'hacking' a multi-million dollar financial company, accross national borders, into a country in an active war and sabre rattling to the rest of the world, have got to be worth some serious consideration and not just a hurried blog post written in a couple of days].
- _jvqm 4y agoThey are, or I wouldn’t be posting here, but I sincerely thank you for your concern and advice.
- lazide 4y agoSince merely knowing what the OP knows already likely implicates him in at least one felony, you (and he) might want to think about that very carefully.
- krageon 4y agoIt's either that or probably go to prison. I know what I'd pick :)
- vimax 4y agoOption 5: Take the money and run Seriously though, I'd just contact Brian Krebs and go from there.
- joshcryer 4y agoYou just told the world about a compromised site that has something to do with crypto and stocks. That was your first mistake. If you want to white hat this you should just contact the admin and mass mail everyone affected and wash your hands of it. Nuking the site could destroy those peoples crypto forever. Don't do that.
- dustymcp 4y agoTell the owners of this?
- binarymax 4y ago1) talk to a lawyer to make sure you’re protected 2) read up on anonymous responsible disclosure - you have to give them the chance to patch it themselves in a reasonable amount of time
- kevin_thibedeau 4y ago> you have to give them the chance to patch it themselves No you don't. If they're just going to bury the truth and hang their users out to dry then the responsible route is to bypass them.
- chamakits 4y agoI’ve never been in a similar position; but I’m thinking about what I’d do if I found the same. The end goal here is to close the loop hole so those affected can be safe as soon as possible with limited risk to yourself. My first thought was to reach out to either a trusted tech journalist that would keep their sources safe (keeping you anonymous), or reach out to an organization like the EFF which has a strong history of defending peoples digital rights and interests. I don’t know if either of these are good fits for their original purpose, but that’s where my mind went immediately. I’d think either would make good efforts to close the issue and keep you safe.
- _jvqm 4y agoThey have been considering this too, but realistically this is a little known service, there are thousands of it like it, and the affected user count is only in the thousands. I don’t know if any of these people would care in the first place. I will tell an anonymous person to try regardless.
- eljimmy 4y ago4) Regret posting this publicly.
- _jvqm 4y agoI have not committed any kind of crime. I'm just telling the story of another person.
- codenesium 4y agoYou probably have. You just don't know it.
- _jvqm 4y agoFair enough
- the_lonely_road 4y agoLike 2 days ago you identified yourself as being in the Netherlands. Not sure how much other private info you have leaked in your comments. I recommend deleting everything now while you hopefully still can.
- _jvqm 4y agoFirst of all, I'm only telling a story of another unnamed person - besides, what exactly are you so worried about?
- elorant 4y agoThat someone will try to locate you and extract the information. You said that there are millions in these accounts and in some cases you can even withdraw money. That sounds like Christmas for criminals. Do yourself a favor and never use this alias in here again. Or anywhere else for that matter. Even better delete the whole freaking post.
- daedalus2027 4y agoDo the most ethical thing, and keep your good karma intact.
- sys_64738 4y agoDon't do anything or they may come after you legally too.
- supermatou 4y agoBe very, very careful - as ANYTHING you do might land you in hot water. Better consult a lawyer before doing anything. Personal anecdote: some years back, I was working with a major government agency and I uncovered a huge security problem (a print queue was unprotected and any user could read the ultra-secret, world's-fate-altering documents). I promplty reported the issue and, instead of a commendation, I nearly got myself arrested. Legal aspects and institutional rules can be complex and counter-intuitive - they can punish even the Good Samaritan! Again: consult a lawyer before doing anything.
- Clubber 4y agoRecently the governor of Missouri, Parson, tried to prosecute a professor who found a huge leak of teacher data. The professor informed the state about it before writing any articles on it and made sure it had been fixed. It just embarrassed the governor, who's office was responsible for security. The governor then proceeded to embarrass himself even more by calling him a hacker (it was raw html) and threatening prosecution and ordering a two year investigation. The professor still had to hire a lawyer and deal with this for two years. https://krebsonsecurity.com/2022/02/report-missouri-governors-office-responsible-for-teacher-data-leak/ https://krebsonsecurity.com/2022/02/report-missouri-governor...
- RajT88 4y agoIt changes nothing about your post, but I believe it was Base64 Encoded session state. Within the raw HTML certainly, but not quite cleartext.
- JoBrad 4y agoIt’s essentially the same. If anyone even searched for that info, several search engines could decode it automatically.
- QuercusMax 4y agoIf I see a base64 blob in a webpage, you can bet I'm going to decode it.
- onlygoodanswer 4y ago
- 4oo4 4y agoGreat job for being so conscientious about responsible disclosure.
- bb88 4y agoReading these comments, it's amazing how hard it is to be a responsible person these days. The bad guys would have no problem selling this data to make a quick buck.
- _jvqm 4y agoWhile the anonymous person understands some of the responses, and will make super sure to do absolutely nil until they have spoken to an attorney (and obviously not access anything on purpose now), they too are a little bit surprised to see some users worried they might get kidnapped and similar. It is like they have never seen any other regular person with money before.
- mpeg 4y agoFrom what you’re describing it sounds a bit like a crypto honeypot … there’s a lot of sites that pose as crypto exchanges but are actually scams, they deliberately expose credentials and have accounts with (fake) millions of dollars in crypto money in them. Except, when you go to withdraw there’s usually some restriction where you can only withdraw to another site account, so you sign up and are forced to deposit some crypto to activate your new account. Then you’ve lost your money.
- _jvqm 4y agoIt is not a honeypot, it’s a service that uses these API keys. I am aware of the withdrawal logics.
- mpeg 4y agoFair enough, just thought I’d warn you just in case.
- blahblarblar 4y agoAstounding the lengths people will go to avoid having to provide a real good or service.
- mpeg 4y agoYeah I wouldn’t believe it if I had not seen a few of these firsthand. So much wasted effort…
- kgc 4y agoYou can check some logins with ihavebeenpwned.com to see if the list has already been exfiltrated.
- PowerBar 4y agoWARNING to people reading this comment: The correct URL is haveibeenpwned.com
- michaelt 4y ago> Now, I'm obviously documenting this insanity to write a blog post over the next couple of days, Many countries have hacking laws that are exceptionally broad, written in the 1980s by legislators who had never even touched a computer. A law might, for example, ban "gaining unauthorized access to a computer system" This means that if you accidentally find what looks like a security problem, and you look around a bit to make sure you're not raising a false alarm - you're already in violation of the law. If your country has any such laws, to claim credit for your discovery would be to admit to a crime. And while you might not have done anything you think of as hacking, put yourself in the mindset of the site operator. They might feel as if you've put a gun to their heads, or that scaring you into shutting up and deleting any data you've downloaded is them protecting their customers - they might go to the cops and give the cops a very different perspective. If you want to alert the world to this breach, may I suggest downloading the breached data anonymously and e-mailing it anonymously to Troy Hunt of Have I Been Pwned?
- _jvqm 4y agoI will tell an anonymous person to do this, but I’m not sure if Troy Hunt cares about a random one-of-thousands service and a few thousand affected users.
- michaelt 4y agoA few minutes ago, you were calling it a "pretty extreme data leak" and "millions of dollars" so I think he'd at least know how to validate the leak and enter it into HIBP.
- _jvqm 4y agoThese statements stand unchanged. The usage of "pretty extreme" could be regarding the "quality" of data, not quantity. Compared to the usual data leaks on HIBP it seems like an occurrence that happens frequently and the affected user count is abysmally low. Some anonymous person might fire off an email to Troy Hunt regardless.
- jimmaswell 4y ago
- na85 4y agoI'm surprised nobody has suggested contacting the FBI or other INTERPOL member force. That's what I would do.
- mulmen 4y agoStop everything you are doing. Contact a lawyer immediately. Do not do any of the things you are considering. People go to prison for this stuff.
- mise_en_place 4y agoThe irony is that data brokers often have this information and will sell to unscrupulous 3rd party buyers.
- thargor90 4y agoThe "right thing to do" is to contact your local CERT (don't give personal information and best use a throwaway email over TOR. Don't trust your local authorities). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_emergency_response_team https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_emergency_response_te...
- grumple 4y agoSteps 2 and 3 are definitely illegal. Send an anonymous email to the site owners / contact info if you want to be a good citizen. Then forget about this. Not your leak, not your problem. Every user in the US has had their personal info, many passwords, and their social security info leaked by now anyway. Don't get personally involved.
- mulmen 4y agoAt this point OP has publicly stated they have potentially committed a crime and intend to commit further crimes. An overzealous LEO can easily track down OP. The only reasonable course of action is to contact a lawyer.
- grumple 4y agoWell, the justice department announced this yesterday which should allow harmless white hat behavior: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/department-justice-announces-new-policy-charging-cases-under-computer-fraud-and-abuse-act https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/department-justice-announces-... But doing anything further is a bad idea imo.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- mulmen 4y agoThat statement absolutely does not bless “harmless white hat behavior”. That interpretation is a step on the path to prison. The Justice Department said they might not prosecute some crimes, depending on how they feel about you. Nobody is innocent. You do not want the Justice Department or any LEO sniffing around your life. The CFAA is still law and violating it is still a crime. You can still have your door kicked down and your life ruined.
- ankaAr 4y agoBe a hero bro, be a hero.
- vmception 4y ago4) Do nothing 5) Sell the credentials ( less liability than 6) 6) yoink
- callmeed 4y agoA roundabout way of doing 1+2 could be to find a reputable journalist and explain the situation to them. They could publish a story (possibly requesting comment from the site owners first) on it and keep you anonymous. This could be a way to do the right thing while lowering your risk of being charged with violating some antiquated hacking law. But also talk to an attorney before doing that.
- chaps 4y agoI've done a fair amount of similar disclosures and have had good and bad experiences. First, consider consulting a lawyer. Then, consider sending it to a reporter who specializes in cybersecurity and who isn't shy about reporting on these issues. They have protocols for this sort of thing and will do proper disclosures beforehand. A way to think about it is that once the reporter reaches out, the company will be in panic mode and try to correct the problem ASAP before bad press gets out. They understand that because a reporter is reaching out to them that an article is in the works and their only option is damage reduction, considering the worse alternative. Reaching out on your own without protections will lead to headaches. IANAL.
- _jvqm 4y agoFirst, thank you very much for your comment, secondly, the anonymous person has forgotten to specifically highlight a certain detail - The entity affected by this vulnerability is NOT a trustworthy company, it is not even a registered company. The service is or was operated by individuals and not under its own registered business entity. They obviously do not wish to describe this service any further, but they want to assure you that no sane person would ever subscribe to it, yet there are thousands of paying active users.
- rad88 4y agoIt sucks for these people, but as you say, they did something insane with their money. I agree with everyone else here who's recommended you speak to a lawyer and then back away. It might be uncomfortable because you (or they) seem fairly conscientious, but you won't change much anyway. Some people might withdraw and then do some other very risky thing with the money. Or maybe you trigger the service immediately closing shop with no withdrawals. Moreover, organized crime is alive and well in this area. Don't assume that because this is an online scam they are not connected. From the sound of it there are millions of dollars at stake for them, and at most a nagging feeling for you saying you should have done something. Or maybe making a name for yourself. In any case it's not worth it. Calling out a random unregistered Russian crypto "business" that people already know is shady won't do anything.
- smcleod 4y agoAs other's have suggested - contact Troy / haveibeenpwned - https://haveibeenpwned.com/FAQs#SubmitBreach https://haveibeenpwned.com/FAQs#SubmitBreach
- cleartextpw 4y ago
- wheresmycraisin 4y agoTell the person to erase all trace he/she every saw the data and to get a lawyer just in case. There's a distinct chance the person will be either blamed for the leak or even worse for hacking into the company. That's enough to completely ruin a life.
- eftychis 4y agoTalk to a lawyer.
- gigatexal 4y agoContact a lawyer to make sure you don’t go to jail and if they say you’re in the clear disclose everything. Or be the source to some journalist and get protection there? But do disclose this so that affected folks can take action.
- JoeyBananas 4y agoExploit it, crypto isn't real money anyway it's just 1s and 0s
- fy20 4y agoOne thing a lot of white hat wannabees don't seem to understand, is that for some vulnerabilities it's not worth the risk of reporting them. There was an article here a few months ago about someone who found a vulnerability with a bank, they reported it their boss, and they got fired. To me this definately feels like it falls into that category. You said the site is really shady to begin with. You are not responsible for the people who are stupid enough to sign up in the first place, so yes, you can have a clear conscious by just ignoring it. Lets pretend it's a less shady site and doesn't involve crypto millions, and you want to report it: I'd look to see if they have a security reporting policy. If they don't, I'd send a vague email "Hello, I think I found a security vulnerability on your site, can you put me in touch with the right person to report it to?" to their main contact address (info@, support@, whatever) and see what the response is. If you get an angry response or a lawyer or just no response, then time to forget it. If you get a developer who sounds like they understand you, then you can proceed.
- chrisMyzel 4y agoI think they would not care much for 1), 2) sounds good but might lead to yourself getting into legal trouble 3) sounds reasonable :))) Is this of personal concern to you? I understand our position and responsibility in handling data and data incidents but it might be worth handing it to someone else. In Germany a goto address would be Chaos Computer Club, I believe they are happy to do responsible handling of something like this, but it might be of a non-concern to them if it's totally not connected to Germany. You might be able to find another org or approach a journalist for help.
- yakak 4y agoAs suggested by others, I think haveibeenpwned is the most likely to help users as much as possible. From a personal liability PoV reporting this to some brokerages with affected accounts is an alternative that only contacts organisations with direct legitimate interest, specific obligations and immunity from a lot of the liability an individual researcher has.
- belkarx 4y agoUnited States' Department of Justice recently revised the CFAA to legally permit access of the type you engaged in (contradicting a few other comments here) https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/us-doj-will-no-longer-prosecute-ethical-hackers-under-cfaa/ https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/us-doj-will-n...