3 ms·
It's not an estimate it's a hard upper limit on energy consumption. And he should have used 0.17 watts not 20. Basically I don't see how it can be refuted.
by SemanticStrengh 4y ago
It's not an estimate it's a hard upper limit on energy consumption. And he should have used 0.17 watts not 20.
Basically I don't see how it can be refuted.
- IshKebab 4y agoOf course it's an estimate. Full of assumptions > assuming the brain is drawing 20W > Assuming each neuron has a fan-out of 1000 > to be fair, they are sparse Also * 1 ATP activation is equivalent to one FLOP * Just having FLOPs is enough to make a human brain It's idiotic.