3 ms·

> I think this would be much more healthy than the multi-phase aim-for-the-moon approach everybody takes today. Healthy for whom? - startups founders? - ange

• marcosdumay 4y ago
  Hum... I answered that just on the next phrase. But now that you enumerated more, you can add "national economy" too.
  • q-big 4y ago
    > Hum... I answered that just on the next phrase. Concerning "And quite likely brings better results for both the investor and the founders.": That "[it] brings better results" for some groups does not imply that it more healthy for this group. Also the other way round: "more healthy for some group" does not necessarily imply "better results for this group". In this sense I did not think that this phrase was to be considered an answer to my point.
    • marcosdumay 4y ago
      Hum, ok. You are interpreting "better results" in a strict monetary sense, without accounting for second-order problems from bad deals. It looks more healthy for both groups. I do expect it to bring better both first-order and second-order results. (Those two are always correlated, and on investment relationships they are very strongly correlated.)