I'm not sure engineering types will be satisfied with these kinds of conclusions: > “It is not someone else’s job to figure out the why or what happens when th

I'm not sure engineering types will be satisfied with these kinds of conclusions: > “It is not someone else’s job to figure out the why or what happens when things go wrong. It is all of our responsibility and we can all be equipped to do it. Let’s get used to that. Let’s build up that muscle of being able to pause and ask those tough questions, even if we can’t identify a single answer at the end of a problem set,” Kaiser says. Hopefully the actual course content is more concrete than this. But this kind of language strikes me as encouraging people to feel the "correct" way about a problem, but not really emphasizing coming up with concrete, actionable solutions. And without actionable solutions, I feel like the value of this content would be very limited.