3 ms·

He would be well within his rights to host no website at all on the domain. Using it solely for email is 100% "using the domain". Period. The end. Not squatt

He would be well within his rights to host no website at all on the domain. Using it solely for email is 100% "using the domain". Period. The end. Not squatting. Just became some crypto bros want the domain does not change that.

ALittleLight 4y ago
First, owning a valuable domain that you don't use is basically the definition of squatting. Second, I never wrote that it was outside of his "rights", I wrote that it was obnoxious.
- Wowfunhappy 4y ago
  > First, owning a valuable domain that you don't use is basically the definition of squatting. But he is using it. For email. It's just an MX record instead of an A record.
- LocalH 4y ago
  Say you buy a shed. However, you never get around to using it. So you’re squatting on that shed, and I demand you relinquish it to someone who will make more use of it.
  - btheshoe 4y ago
    Yes, that's how it should work
    - LocalH 4y ago
      Do you feel that nobody should own anything that they're not actively using, and that such things should be removed from their possession?
    - kadoban 4y ago
      What about if someone with more expensive tools than yours wants it? Do you just give it up?