If the EULA wasn't notified to you at the point of lease, or indeed of the transaction was described as a sale, then it's fraud as you were misled as to the nat

If the EULA wasn't notified to you at the point of lease, or indeed of the transaction was described as a sale, then it's fraud as you were misled as to the nature of the product in order to provide a financial gain for Red. I think you have a good basis for a small claims court case to recoup spending on peripherals. I think it could go either way, but sadly the establishment aren't keen on limiting they overreach of companies which mislead when they call things sales and which try to own the World through Eulas. Thought: if their EULA is lawful then a post-transaction contract from your side should be lawful too ...? (YMMV, I am clearly not a lawyer and this is so far from legal advice.)