3 ms·
We could probably just charge tobacco companies... Or do the same for all smokers. Back of the envelope, it looks like about $370B in medical expenses & lost e
by ineedasername 5y ago
We could probably just charge tobacco companies...
Or do the same for all smokers. Back of the envelope, it looks like about $370B in medical expenses & lost economic output per year, with about 20B packs of cigarettes sold (US), so that's about $19/pack of cigarettes.
Then put that money into a trust to cover expenses for smokers so that they don't burden non-smokers in either tax dollars or increased insurance premiums. You'll need some money to administer the process too, so let's say another $2/pack for that. Call it the "True Cost Smoking Tax".
- bluedino 5y agoOkay, now do soda.
- tintedfireglass 5y ago
- schuke 5y agoSoda is neither addictive nor carcinogenic.
- krageon 5y agoSoda is absolutely addictive. Test it easily by drinking a few cans every day for a month or two and then stopping cold turkey.
- randombits0 5y agoWell, yeah, when they specifically add an addictive stimulant drug to it.