3 ms·
Oh yeah definitely. I think the thing I heard was that rather than like, functioning like a tent pole on inflation it was more like just a small contributing fa
by camgunz 5y ago
Oh yeah definitely. I think the thing I heard was that rather than like, functioning like a tent pole on inflation it was more like just a small contributing factor, but will be for years to come. I kind of stuck on it here because I think the politics have been "this is what happens when you give people hundreds of billions of dollars", but I don't really think the evidence supports that argument.
- randomdata 5y ago> "this is what happens when you give people hundreds of billions of dollars" Well, in fairness, at the onset of the pandemic there was a looming fear of deflation and we weren't very far from that actually happening. All that stimulus money was poured into the economy by the central bank specifically to create inflation, per inflation target mandates. The idea is not unwarranted. But also not that simple. Where the money ends up is equally important. You could 'print' trillions of dollars, but if you gave it all to Bezos, not much would change. He'd just sit on. Maybe inflate some assets like real estate, but he's not going to drive up the price of bread. Bread relies on purchases from the masses who don't have more money to spend in that scenario. If you distributed that money out to everyone, however, then they each do have more money for bread. Then you can start to see inflation come of it as people start to compete with their extra cash in hand.