5 ms·
Perhaps I’m missing some advanced theories or contradictions, but it seems to me quite intuitive or at least reasonable that there exists some very efficient ge
by SnowHill9902 5y ago
Perhaps I’m missing some advanced theories or contradictions, but it seems to me quite intuitive or at least reasonable that there exists some very efficient generators of entropy, i.e. black holes. Even if not having fallen into a black hole, such water would have decayed to heat and fundamental particles eventually.
Why is it contradicting that it happens much faster in some places in the universe? It may be surprising but what does it contradict? I’m asking sincerely.
Regarding the water thought, if you recite a poem inside a chamber, it turns into heat. If you are outside and can only measure that the room slightly increases its temperature you also can’t recover the poem.
- marcosdumay 5y agoThat's because something may fall on the black-hole with larger entropy than the usual "black-hole matter", and it would decay into the lower entropy particles. But whether something with higher entropy than "black-hole matter" exists is a more refined question than if black-holes erase the entropy of what fallen into it. And Quantum Mechanics has a problem with erasing entropy, even if it's into a larger amount.