3 ms·
This article rang a bell with me. It's basically word-for-word the script for this video which was posted more than a year before date on the article: https://w
by spirit557 4y ago
This article rang a bell with me. It's basically word-for-word the script for this video which was posted more than a year before date on the article: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6COKC5ZU6gM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6COKC5ZU6gM
I don't know why this is or if anyone cares, just thought I'd mention it
- russellbeattie 4y agoI just linked to same video! I would never have noticed it was word for word! You're right. My suspicion is the YouTube channel is a content factory, where the guy narrates a published article over whatever military B-roll video they can find. I highly doubt it was reverse. Still sorta useful. It's nice to see the actual weapon, and I doubt I'd ever normally read the article otherwise.
- TMWNN 4y ago>My suspicion is the YouTube channel is a content factory, where the guy narrates a published article over whatever military B-roll video they can find. I highly doubt it was reverse. I've seen this with several YouTube channels with very generic military-sounding names. I hadn't realized/expected that the channels would just plagiarize existing articles, though!