5 ms·

Michelle Obama programming. Me too related programming. Forced lgt story lines in unrelated programming. Everything you experienced in your life can and doe

by ipaddr 5y ago

Michelle Obama programming. Me too related programming. Forced lgt story lines in unrelated programming. Everything you experienced in your life can and does corrupt you.

samstave 5y ago
This is why Disney is an abomination. Also, if you look at the content tropes constantly used, and especially used in much of the netflix library: --- - Lots of satan/evil - The constant CIA/NSA/FBI/Cop/Assassin Badass Porn, with the invariable singular hacker support guy on the squad that can get into any system and has a 3D blueprint with wireframe models of every building - The hero cop constantly going against the bureaucratic system that holding back his personal justice If you cant see the constant hero worship of rogue cops/cia agent/killer/evil etc in literally 90% of hollywood content puts a subconscious desire in the impressionable young minds of males to acquiesce to a violent society where they can see themselves as the fictitious bad-ass action person. Etc... The entire hollywood movie-narrative is an incestuous cess-pool-adrenochrome--eating-gay-frog-orgy. (Tongue in cheek alex jones reference, relax)
notpachet 5y ago
Occasionally it redeems you.
tomnipotent 5y ago
> Forced lgt So you agree then that hetero relationships in children's media is also a political agenda?
- chernevik 5y ago
  Maybe by your lights. It is a fact that gay marriage is an experiment, never before tried in human history. We do not know how successful it will be in raising children to be healthy, productive human beings -- which is the chief social purpose of marriage. Likewise the whole sexual revolution and the normalization of sex outside marriage is an experiment. We do know that "hetero" relationships, and married ones in particular, can succeed enormously at producing children and raising them successfully. Perhaps these various new arrangements will succeed just as well, and I expect enormous political pressure on evidence and analysis to support just that conclusion, but we will see. Until time has told, the presumption that homosexual relationships are the same as heterosexual is a matter of conjecture and, well, politics.
  - AlexandrB 5y ago
    > Likewise the whole sexual revolution and the normalization of sex outside marriage is an experiment. This seems extremely ahistorical. I'm pretty sure humans were having sex exclusively outside of marriage for most of the history of Homo Sapiens as a species. Marriage, and especially exclusively-monogamous marriage, is a relatively recent invention. > We do not know how successful it will be in raising children to be healthy, productive human beings -- which is the chief social purpose of marriage. We kind-of know though[1]: > To date, the consensus in the social science literature is clear: in the United States, children living with two same-sex parents fare, as well as children residing with two different-sex parents. Numerous credible and methodologically sound social science studies, including many drawing on nationally representative data, form the basis of this consensus. These studies reveal that children raised in same-sex parent families fare just, as well as children raised in different-sex parent families across a wide spectrum of child well-being measures: academic performance, cognitive development, social development, psychological health, early sexual activity, and substance abuse. Families with same-sex parents are not a new thing in 2022, there's been plenty of time to draw conclusions. [1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4091994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4091994/
    - chernevik 5y ago
      Your kitchen drawers are full of chipped flint tools, right? I mean, that's what was used for cutting and chopping for most of human history. Marriage might be "a relatively recent invention", but it was so successful and adaptive that we really don't have much (any?) record of any other arrangement of human sexual relations.
      - andrekandre 5y ago
        > Marriage might be "a relatively recent invention", but it was so successful and adaptive that we really don't have much (any?) record of any other arrangement of human sexual relations. then why do we have so much divorce?
  - colinmhayes 5y ago
lurker619 5y ago
I sense a pattern in your complaints...by any chance do you also oppose abortion?
scarface74 5y ago
Were you watching TV in the 80s when Nancy Reagan was everywhere with her “Just Say No” campaign including on “Different Strokes”?
- 0des 5y ago
  D.a.r.e.

by ipaddr 5y ago

Michelle Obama programming. Me too related programming. Forced lgt story lines in unrelated programming. Everything you experienced in your life can and does corrupt you.

samstave 5y ago

This is why Disney is an abomination. Also, if you look at the content tropes constantly used, and especially used in much of the netflix library: --- - Lots of satan/evil - The constant CIA/NSA/FBI/Cop/Assassin Badass Porn, with the invariable singular hacker support guy on the squad that can get into any system and has a 3D blueprint with wireframe models of every building - The hero cop constantly going against the bureaucratic system that holding back his personal justice If you cant see the constant hero worship of rogue cops/cia agent/killer/evil etc in literally 90% of hollywood content puts a subconscious desire in the impressionable young minds of males to acquiesce to a violent society where they can see themselves as the fictitious bad-ass action person. Etc... The entire hollywood movie-narrative is an incestuous cess-pool-adrenochrome--eating-gay-frog-orgy. (Tongue in cheek alex jones reference, relax)

notpachet 5y ago

Occasionally it redeems you.

tomnipotent 5y ago

> Forced lgt So you agree then that hetero relationships in children's media is also a political agenda?

chernevik 5y ago
Maybe by your lights. It is a fact that gay marriage is an experiment, never before tried in human history. We do not know how successful it will be in raising children to be healthy, productive human beings -- which is the chief social purpose of marriage. Likewise the whole sexual revolution and the normalization of sex outside marriage is an experiment. We do know that "hetero" relationships, and married ones in particular, can succeed enormously at producing children and raising them successfully. Perhaps these various new arrangements will succeed just as well, and I expect enormous political pressure on evidence and analysis to support just that conclusion, but we will see. Until time has told, the presumption that homosexual relationships are the same as heterosexual is a matter of conjecture and, well, politics.
- AlexandrB 5y ago
  > Likewise the whole sexual revolution and the normalization of sex outside marriage is an experiment. This seems extremely ahistorical. I'm pretty sure humans were having sex exclusively outside of marriage for most of the history of Homo Sapiens as a species. Marriage, and especially exclusively-monogamous marriage, is a relatively recent invention. > We do not know how successful it will be in raising children to be healthy, productive human beings -- which is the chief social purpose of marriage. We kind-of know though[1]: > To date, the consensus in the social science literature is clear: in the United States, children living with two same-sex parents fare, as well as children residing with two different-sex parents. Numerous credible and methodologically sound social science studies, including many drawing on nationally representative data, form the basis of this consensus. These studies reveal that children raised in same-sex parent families fare just, as well as children raised in different-sex parent families across a wide spectrum of child well-being measures: academic performance, cognitive development, social development, psychological health, early sexual activity, and substance abuse. Families with same-sex parents are not a new thing in 2022, there's been plenty of time to draw conclusions. [1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4091994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4091994/
  - chernevik 5y ago
    Your kitchen drawers are full of chipped flint tools, right? I mean, that's what was used for cutting and chopping for most of human history. Marriage might be "a relatively recent invention", but it was so successful and adaptive that we really don't have much (any?) record of any other arrangement of human sexual relations.
    - andrekandre 5y ago
      > Marriage might be "a relatively recent invention", but it was so successful and adaptive that we really don't have much (any?) record of any other arrangement of human sexual relations. then why do we have so much divorce?
- colinmhayes 5y ago

lurker619 5y ago

I sense a pattern in your complaints...by any chance do you also oppose abortion?

scarface74 5y ago

Were you watching TV in the 80s when Nancy Reagan was everywhere with her “Just Say No” campaign including on “Different Strokes”?

0des 5y ago
D.a.r.e.