3 ms·
It doesn't have to be complicated. The shareholders should have a right to decide through a proxy vote on whether to accept the offer
by bko 5y ago
It doesn't have to be complicated. The shareholders should have a right to decide through a proxy vote on whether to accept the offer
- rufusroflpunch 5y agoTo me, this seems obvious. No reason something this fateful shouldn’t be put to shareholder vote. No good reason, at least.
- tenpies 5y ago
- chx 5y agoYishan Wong , the CEO of Reddit until 2012 have tweeted a long thread about how Musk doesn't understand the current state of moderation necessary because he was much more involved with an earlier Internet. But I am of opinion that Yishan is also behind as one half of the debaters simply left facts and reality behind. This post here is an example.
- ben_w 5y agoShareholding is not democratic. It is one-dollar-one-vote and therefore plutocratic rather than democratic. (I was going to say it also involves too much money to be lefty, but then I realise that just might be my Overton window and isn’t necessarily related to what you think “lefty” means).
- rpmisms 5y agoThe massive and immediate shift from "It's a private company and they can do what they want" to chanting in unison "This is a danger to our democracy" has been horrifying to watch. I don't own a TV, and yet I can tell you what the chiron said this morning, nearly verbatim. Ask anyone who watched it.
- bpodgursky 5y agoYeah, I think Elon is going to demand this (and as a 9% shareholder himself, is likely to get it)
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- lokar 5y agoHe could have made a cash tender if he was serious. But he isn't, and does not have the cash.