4 ms·
Without saying how much you asked for, this is a non-story.
by dazc 5y ago
Without saying how much you asked for, this is a non-story.
- tosh 5y ago> $840K mortgage with 20% down for a $1.05M offer. House not appraised yet, but almost certainly above offer price since all comps from the realtor are $1.2M. https://twitter.com/dvassallo/status/1513685250655760384 https://twitter.com/dvassallo/status/1513685250655760384
- rsynnott 5y agoThat's over four times their demonstrable annual earnings (if your earnings are as inconsistent as this, a bank is not generally going to care very much about what you were earning two years ago). Totally unsurprising that they were turned down, surely? Also unclear whether this is earnings from a job or something else (the "adjusted gross income" would make me suspect at least partially something else). In a time of uncertainty, banks are going to be cautious, and some lenders realistically don't want to touch self-employed etc at all.
- SilasX 5y agoAlso answered: He paid himself out a salary that was a small fraction of those figures (but most of which was self-employment income): https://twitter.com/dvassallo/status/1513683918058262528 https://twitter.com/dvassallo/status/1513683918058262528 There was also a tweet saying how much of the last year was investment income, but I can't find that and Twitter actively makes that hard to search for.
- rsynnott 5y agoYeah, so he should be going to a specialist broker/lender, not a random bank.
- quantified 5y agoA small bank or S&L that services the loan after issuing is more likely to issue the mortgage. And it’s more likely to benefit the community compared to a big bank. Worked for me.
- parkingrift 5y agoBanks were lending seven times annual earnings as of 2021. I have not seen updated numbers, but four times earnings is likely on the lower end of the average loan to income ratio.
- rsynnott 5y agoWait, really? I didn't know it had gotten that bad again; those are subprime crisis sort of numbers.
- parkingrift 5y agoYes. However, it doesn't actually say much about affordability because interest rates drive such a large percentage of costs. A $285,000 mortgage (ignoring taxes+fees) would be $1,126/month at 2.5% APR but $1,618/month at 5.5%. If you use "conventional" lending standards a borrower with a household income of around $39k could qualify at 2.5%, but at 5.5% the income requirement would jump up to around $55k. The ratio drops from around 7.3 to 5.1. https://www.longtermtrends.net/home-price-median-annual-income-ratio/ https://www.longtermtrends.net/home-price-median-annual-inco...
- Dylan16807 5y agoIt says he didn't even get that far, because they treated his income as almost nothing.
- FireBeyond 5y agoIt doesn't say that - it says they found his income too inconsistent, year to year.
- Dylan16807 5y agoIt does say that. >> Few variables are missing here like the mortgage amount you are asking for and the upraised value of the house. > [numbers] But we didn't even get to that state with this lender. > They excluded all my business income because it’s too inconsistent. Quote: “Your business income is too inconsistent. Only usable income is capital gains $14,527 + $780 rental income.” Didn't get to house details, income was treated as $15k which is under the poverty line.