3 ms·
Yes, they could, but could they keep everyone in a city of millions in their houses though?
by gerbilly 4y ago
Yes, they could, but could they keep everyone in a city of millions in their houses though?
- jimmydorry 4y agoThey would ring fence the village / suburb. I don't see a major difference between nothing entering or leaving an apartment compared to entering or leaving the village / suburb. Both will run out of food in a similar time span.
- 0xy 4y agoYes. It's happened before. After the Boston Marathon bombing there was a "shelter-in-place" order given that prevented anyone from leaving their homes, and subjected residents to military rule (including door-to-door warrantless searches).
- marcosdumay 4y agoEasily. It's just a matter of running through the streets at random and punishing the people they caught badly enough.
- stjohnswarts 4y agoPretty much. In the Uyghur concentration camps they regularly gather up the victims of the camps and have them watch beatings and brutal rapes. I've read that in the testimony of several escapees from the camps. That plus everyone gets "minorly" tortured for not learning Chinese fast enough or minor transgressions like looking away/closing eyes/crying when told to watch a beating.