4 ms·
I don't think the people who moved to the housing projects were typically sleeping on the streets. I think it was more a case of upgrading to modern sanitation
by BurningFrog 5y ago
I don't think the people who moved to the housing projects were typically sleeping on the streets.
I think it was more a case of upgrading to modern sanitation standards etc.
That said, I have no real detailed knowledge, and would be happy to learn how wrong I am about this :)
- seanmcdirmid 5y agoBottom living standards were a lot lower back then: people could live in shacks without plumbing, flop houses were plentiful. These days none of that is legally allowed, so people would have fallen into that housing 50-80 years ago are homeless today. That being said, poverty reductions between then and now are real, it’s only that our standards keep getting higher (as they should).
- BurningFrog 5y agoI would 100% bring back flop houses. They're much better than sleeping in the street. The insanity of "we can't let you have a bad X, so you get no X!" is one of my least favorite things in this era...
- seanmcdirmid 5y agoI agree. I remember the flop house my grandpa ran in Spokane fondly. We cousins called it the empty arms. On the other hand, flop houses aren’t economical to run anymore, and the drug problems (especially with decriminalization) have gotten much worse. It’s not clear they can work like they did in the past.