4 ms·
BattleTech nailed this decades ago. Watching this took me right back to my childhood. Edit: AT-ST Walker, too.
by darkteflon 5y ago
BattleTech nailed this decades ago. Watching this took me right back to my childhood.
Edit: AT-ST Walker, too.
- duskwuff 5y agoIt's interesting that most fictional depictions of legged robots (outside of explicitly humanoid robots) use digitigrade legs. Did the artists model their art after animals which happened to have these legs, or did they subconsciously realize that this would be more effective?
- marcosdumay 5y agoIsn't it obvious? After you see an ostrich running, there is little doubt about its efficiency. Now, actually capturing that efficiency in a real system takes some really hard engineering work. Fictional robots do not need to conserve energy, compensate for impacts, etc.
- beaconstudios 5y agoNow you have me imagining mechs with human legs and it's making me uncomfortable. A bit like those "birds with human arms" photo edits.
- girvo 5y agoIt really does look exactly like a BattleMech from one of the MechWarrior video games doesn't it! Thats fascinating. Reminds me most of the Locust: https://www.sarna.net/wiki/Locust https://www.sarna.net/wiki/Locust https://sites.google.com/site/fineartofmechcombat/_/rsrc/1468738697145/home/general-guide/locust/xctl.jpg https://sites.google.com/site/fineartofmechcombat/_/rsrc/146...
- hnhg 5y agoED209 too. But how will they handle stairs? https://youtu.be/mRDl5_-wJ0Y https://youtu.be/mRDl5_-wJ0Y
- hef19898 5y agoAnother thing that we are going to see in combat vehicles in the next decades, IMHO, is something like OmniMechs. Meaning that future weapon systems, e.g. fighters or tanks (not the upcoming generation but those after that, F-35's successor' successors) will feature LRUs (line-replaceable units) that carry different mission capabilities. That way, a fighter can land as a ground support fighter or drone controller and lift of as air superiority fighter by swapping a hand full of modules out.
- dumpsterdiver 5y agoIt certainly sounds terrifying having an adversary that can pivot into superiority based on the situation, but I wonder how practical it would be when faced with an opponent who simply brought the right amount of non-modular vehicles in the first place? If you have to pivot to gain air superiority, there's a really good chance that you've already lost.
- dwighttk 5y agoI feel like in theory you’d be able to adjust the mix across the battlefield throughout the battle and it would be less about one plane’s ability to pivot. And in theory, theory is identical to practice ;)
- dumpsterdiver 5y agoEveryone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth. - Mike Tyson
- kingkawn 5y agoSounds super expensive and nothing a javelin can’t take care of
- hef19898 5y agoLike bazookas took care of Panzer IVs? I like how everyone just heard about Javelins and now thinks they rendered all armored vehicles obsolete over night. EDIT: You now what takes care of a Javelin, or rather the guy using it? A bat or a knife.