4 ms·
Companies go where the money is, this is unfortunately where the money is. Samsung sells "commercial signage displays" which are kind of dumb TVs. The BE55T-H
by slimsag 5y ago
Companies go where the money is, this is unfortunately where the money is.
Samsung sells "commercial signage displays" which are kind of dumb TVs. The BE55T-H for example is 55in 4k for $600, stripped down OS / basically just HDMI in. BE65T-H is 65in for $800.
They're also intended for always-on semi-static content from what I understand, which is nice.
- judge2020 5y ago> They're also a bit better displays given they're intended for always-on semi-static content from what I understand. While perhaps true, the extra price you’re paying is all in how they need to reach the same margins without that TV showing ads or otherwise having smart features they can sell.
- 88913527 5y agoPaying $600 or $800 for a television was at one point a normal thing. Not sure what current prices are, but that premium doesn't sound terrible.
- MBCook 5y agoLooks like it starts at about $400 for a normal 55 inch 4K Samsung, depending on model.
- Tagbert 5y agoIt’s a pretty good bet that that low price is subsidized by customer tracking shared with advertisers and the display of ads.
- MBCook 5y agoWe know it is. And that model is a few years old. But that’s the base price people would compare against. A 50% premium to get rid of that creepy stuff is pretty heavy, though it may be less for higher end stuff or newer models.
- SilasX 5y agoYep, and I know TVs are cheap now because they’re always brought up to explain why the official inflation numbers seem lower than actual experience. “Okay, yeah, food, transportation, health care, and housing, sure, they went up… but if you pointlessly destroyed your TV and needed to buy a new one — whoa, Nelly, you’d be sittin’ pretty!”
- gramie 5y agoAnd in 2001 I bought a 32-inch CRT television for about $1,600. That was normal then.
- fgonzag 5y agoThose prices seem extremely reasonable. I will be looking at them for my next tv purchase, even though its probably more than a few years off. I just hope they keep the line
- gruez 5y ago>Those prices seem extremely reasonable. Whether that's actually true would depend on the picture quality. Paying $800 for a TV that has similar picture quality to a $300 walmart black friday TV is not "reasonable" at all.
- gernb 5y agoThose are not close to top end TVs. They're old tech. Their 65inch QLED consumer model is $900. The signage model is $6400 (yes, 7x) https://www.samsung.com/us/business/displays/pro-tv/bh-series/65-bht-series-qled-4k-uhd-hdr-pro-tv-terrace-edition-lh65bhtelgfxgo/ https://www.samsung.com/us/business/displays/pro-tv/bh-serie... https://www.samsung.com/us/televisions-home-theater/tvs/qled-4k-tvs/65-q60a-qled-4k-smart-tv-2021-qn65q60aafxza/ https://www.samsung.com/us/televisions-home-theater/tvs/qled...
- oliwarner 5y agoThe signage model is significantly different. IP55 and 1500nits (up from 450, reviewed). Might go some way to explain the costs.
- ed25519FUUU 5y agoWhy not just buy a cutting edge consumer TV and not connect it to the internet? Use an Apple TV or some other device.
- oliwarner 5y ago> Companies go where the money is And the money is only there is the customers are still there. If they're getting up and walking away with their money (or even demanding it returned for a loss of value), an anti-consumer decision isn't so easy to justify. I'm never going to buy a TV that tracks what I watch, let alone one that exploits that information to advertise to me.