3 ms·
The real conspiracies, are just unproven yet conspiracy theories, and they are just not proven/known enough about because they will kill anyone trying to expose
by tough 5y ago
The real conspiracies, are just unproven yet conspiracy theories, and they are just not proven/known enough about because they will kill anyone trying to expose them. or shut them down.
The rich rule the world. They do not answer before anyone. They can start wars, profit from them, and then get to be peacemakers. They get to pay less taxes, even if they earn much more than regular citizens.
See current forms of governments, which is mostly a parody of choice between red/blue team, and with the only expectancy of each team -looking- for each other. They're the same thing.
In the US you can legally -lobby- someone in congress or whatever into doing what you want. That's called bribery everywhere else...
All the bull shit is there so the fog is bigger and the real shit can't be prosecuted or condemned.
Divide et impera, as long as they can feed us bullshit to divide us against ourselves, they won't be the target.
- alephr 5y agoIs there any story you can't justify with this reasoning?
- DaltonCoffee 5y agoPick two: Justice, rich people, America (see Will Smith)
- alephr 5y agoWhy do you think this is a response to my question?
- legulere 5y agoYou mean real conspiracies. They usually get to the public as it’s impossible to keep everyone’s mouth shut. People usually don’t do much though when things come out. But you’re right that the rich are often above the law.
- tough 5y agoYeah you're right, fixed it in the parent. Thanks
- imtringued 5y agoIs this really a conspiracy? What if it is just a huge misunderstanding? What if the real problem is that nobody understands the true nature of money? What if the real problem is that nobody understands the significance of land? Chartalism sounds close to the truth considering ancient egypt adopted a grain bank system which is a commodity standard that is not based around the control of the economy. After all, anyone who farms grains, can "print money" because grains themselves were money! If you want aristocracy to have power over the "legitimate" economy, i.e. the economy characterized by a high degree of specialization and quite specifically the division of labor, then having money that does not grow and shrink in accordance to people's activity, and exclusively obeys its holder, more specifically, those who earned their money in the past and have yet to decide what to do with it, is the easiest way to achieve that. If you think about it, if the saver or land owner has complete authority over his money and land then he is transferring power from the past into the present and the future in a world that otherwise does not stand still, where growth and decay are par for the course. Socially speaking, death is quite useful, it prevents the elderly from halting the progress of humanity. What if we put a stop to that? Now imagine a world where you need to acquire power once and keep it forever. Power doesn't die but humans do. Then suddenly, everyone will be encouraged to acquire power at all costs, the sooner the better. Everyone will be living their entire life in a rat race.