3 ms·
I have a Dell 24" 4k, which I got about two years ago, and back then, only Dell and Asus had a 24" option. I have no idea why manufacturers are so insistent on
by copperx 5y ago
I have a Dell 24" 4k, which I got about two years ago, and back then, only Dell and Asus had a 24" option. I have no idea why manufacturers are so insistent on selling 27" 4k monitors; 2x scaling looks too big, and non-integer scaling looks blurry because the resolution is too low for 27".
My theory is that most people, for all practical purposes, are blind.
- vonseel 5y agoIt seems the only option available is the Lg $700 monitor. So at 24” 4K does everything looks nice and smooth without scaling like a built in Retina display?
- copperx 5y agoAbsolutely. That was my intention when I purchased the monitor, and it definitely delivered. I bought mine for $279. However, I had to return two of them because of a pronounced moire-like pattern created by the anti-reflective coating. The third one, the one I kept, still has a slightly visible pattern. I spend most of my day watching a screen, and I want it to be perfect. Because of this, I would be tempted to buy the new Apple display. However, buying an iMac makes much more economic sense. I have no idea why display manufacturers can't get the details right. Windows and Gnome look gorgeous at 2x rendering. macOS does too, but that's expected.