Public interest doesn’t automatically protect the release of private materials, nor does it obligate Zoom to continue employing someone who is actively working

Public interest doesn’t automatically protect the release of private materials, nor does it obligate Zoom to continue employing someone who is actively working against their key business partners. This isn’t really a whistleblower case either. The person didn’t take materials to authorities to notify them of a coverup. They watermarked their Twitter handle on them and put them on Twitter for personal gain and fame. I’m not sure what you’re trying to imply regarding the firing, but this seems like a very clear cut case of Zoom being in the right and the employee getting fired for clear reasons.