I will definitely keep reading and learning, as well as gaining practical implementation experience. We'll have to see how that goes, and what the solution will

I will definitely keep reading and learning, as well as gaining practical implementation experience. We'll have to see how that goes, and what the solution will end up being. > Another direction you could take is to define just the API, and use the opencascade kernel (like FreeCAD) until the rest of your code is ready. A CAD kernel is the central dependency for any CAD program, and I feel that it would be wrong to just use one and accept its limitations. I need to be able to take ownership, to work on it directly. OpenCASCADE is a huge pile of C++ code, which is the opposite of all that. (Not saying it's wrong to use in general, just that I'm the wrong guy to work on a huge pile of C++ code.) I've considered using Truck[1], but decided not to do that for now. I really want to see what I can come up with. If that doesn't work out, at least I'll be in a much better decision to decide what other option would be best. [1] https://github.com/ricosjp/truck https://github.com/ricosjp/truck