4 ms·

I've found Gradle to be very straightforward, intuitive, and easy to use. I switched one of my projects from Maven over to Gradle, and coming from Maven XML, th

• lolinder 5y ago
  Maven to Gradle is a huge improvement, but I think a lot of people here are coming from the JS world. Package.json is incredibly simple compared to Gradle.
  • kaba0 5y ago
    Is it? Where does my special css file go, what option is valid in this context, do I need babel, or this other 1000 package? It does tell you something that literally every framework will generate you a file, while you can easily write your build script by hand for even large java projects.
  • matsemann 5y ago
    Disagree, maven to gradle is a downgrade. Yes, xml is boring, but it's still incredible simple, almost just a verbose package.json. And it's convention over configuration, if you do stuff like everyone else, it just works. Gradle however, is a dsl in a language almost no java devs use. All gradle files are different, so copying an example from somewhere else probably won't work in your context etc.
    • foverzar 5y ago
      > Gradle however, is a dsl in a language almost no java devs use Gradle with Groovy sometimes gets kinda hard to comprehend Gradle with Kotlin is entirely different experience, largely due to proper typing.
• vips7L 5y ago
  I’m going to have to really disagree. While XML might be verbose, it’s dead simple and maven is extremely well documented. Gradle on the other hand is cryptic, relies on stack overflow to document it, and breaks your build scripts every release.