3 ms·
I have the impression, that now some of them seem to really end up in some practical applications. Funnily enough someone just today showed me a feature of his
by fleischhauf 5y ago
I have the impression, that now some of them seem to really end up in some practical applications. Funnily enough someone just today showed me a feature of his phone where you can select some undesired objects in youe photo and it would just replace them with a fitting background indistinguishable from the original photo.
- Groxx 5y agoIt's rather entertaining when this happens in the opposite direction automatically too: https://twitter.com/mitchcohen/status/1476351601862483968 https://twitter.com/mitchcohen/status/1476351601862483968
- Kerrick 5y agoThe followup on that is... it didn't happen. There was a leaf in the foreground, and the depth of field in the photo was large enough that it was in focus rather than blurring. https://twitter.com/mitchcohen/status/1476951534160257026 https://twitter.com/mitchcohen/status/1476951534160257026
- efraim 5y agoIn a follow up tweet it looks like there was a leaf on a tree in the foreground that obscured her face, not an AI replacement.
- amelius 5y agoIt was already debunked. If you scroll down in that Twitter thread, you read: > Big news! I sent @sdw the original image. He theorized a leaf from a foreground tree obscured the face. I didn’t think anything was in view, and the closest tree is a Japanese Maple (smaller leaves). But he’s right! Here’s a video I just shot, showing the parallax. Wow!
- Groxx 5y agoAw. But I guess it's better than too-fancy AI in the phone :) TIL though, thank you!
- hackernewds 5y agoMagic eraser on Pixel?