3 ms·
Maybe not, but MS does follow the DMCA takedown process. > "If the notice alleges that the entire contents of a repository infringe, or a package infringes, we
by hundchenkatze 5y ago
Maybe not, but MS does follow the DMCA takedown process.
> "If the notice alleges that the entire contents of a repository infringe, or a package infringes, we will skip to Step 6 and disable the entire repository or package expeditiously." [0]
This is what was going on with some Grand Theft Auto mods[1] and youtube-dl [2]
[0] https://docs.github.com/en/site-policy/content-removal-policies/dmca-takedown-policy#a-how-does-this-actually-work https://docs.github.com/en/site-policy/content-removal-polic...
[1] https://www.thegamer.com/taketwo-dmca-takedowns-gta-mods/ https://www.thegamer.com/taketwo-dmca-takedowns-gta-mods/
[2] https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/software/youtube-dl-removed-from-github-after-riaa-dmca-notice/ https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/software/youtube-dl-re...
- judge2020 5y agoSo does everyone else. Only self-hosted gives you the ability to ignore DMCA takedowns because the same entity is taking liability for either not following a dmca or performing the actual copyright infringement.
- chii 5y ago> MS does follow the DMCA takedown process. which would be bad if the repo had any copyrighted materials. But does it?
- blibble 5y agoyou're not thinking like a bureaucrat they can do it exceptionally slowly and specifically