3 ms·
I read the parent as implying that it's the designer who is thinking of “disability” as a begrudged requirement that is afforded an out-of-the-way configuration
by cwillu 5y ago
I read the parent as implying that it's the designer who is thinking of “disability” as a begrudged requirement that is afforded an out-of-the-way configuration option so as to not inflict the ugly affordances on the rest of the population.
- eyelidlessness 5y agoThat seems like the least charitable interpretation of the facts I can imagine. Nonetheless if it’s true, Apple doesn’t just wing it when someone goes rogue on full design language redesigns.